Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1380MHz vs 1036MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2200 Mobile
2.122 TFLOPS
Tesla PG500 216 +565%
14.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

695 MHz
Base Clock
1260 MHz
1036 MHz
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1377 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
88.13GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
1024
Shading Units
5120
64
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
66.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
2.122 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
66.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.0
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy