NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA GRID A100A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1005MHz vs 924MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000 SE
1.892 TFLOPS
GRID A100A
+634%
13.89 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
823 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
924 MHz
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
108
1024
Shading Units
6912
64
TMUs
432
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
29.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
59.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
1.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
59.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
400W
250 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
8.0
6.4
Shader Model
N/A
