Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock924MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000 SE +309%
1.892 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

823 MHz
Base Clock
-
924 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
59.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
59.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy