Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 84% (1700MHz vs 924MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
12288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000 SE
1.892 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250 +2292%
45.26 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

823 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
924 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
208
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
13312
64
TMUs
832
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
59.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
1.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
59.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy