Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE and 2GB VRAM Quadro P520 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 62% (1493MHz vs 924MHz)
Lower TDP (18W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000 SE +64%
1.892 TFLOPS
Quadro P520 Mobile
1.147 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

823 MHz
Base Clock
1303 MHz
924 MHz
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.89 GPixel/s
59.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.83 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.92 GFLOPS
1.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1147 GFLOPS
59.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.83 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
18W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GP108
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy