Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 260W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16 +498%
12.86 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
1024
Shading Units
4608
64
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
TU102
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy