NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1557MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
+79%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro P600
1.196 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M3000M
+82%
2016
Quadro P600
1105
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M3000M
+151%
941
Quadro P600
374
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1329 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1557 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.91 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.37 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.68 GFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1196 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GP107
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
