Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M +1890%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GT216
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
32W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy