NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
+646%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2800M
0.288 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Dec 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
1024
Shading Units
96
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
288.0 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
G92
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
