Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200 +65%
3.553 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GK110B
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy