NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1036MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
+1%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro M2200 Mobile
2.122 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
695 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1036 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1377 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
88.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.15 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.30 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.122 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.30 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GM206
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
