Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1260MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Max Q +770%
18.71 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
585 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1260 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
58
1024
Shading Units
7424
64
TMUs
232
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.0 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
292.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.71 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.71 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
292.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GA103
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
22 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy