NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+54%
3.318 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M3000M
2016
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+59%
3220
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M3000M
941
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+59%
1505
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
TU117
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
