Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

NVIDIA Quadro M4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M4000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M4000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (120W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M4000 +93%
2.573 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
1664
Shading Units
512
104
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

49.47 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
80.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.573 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
80.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GF110
GM204-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy