Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

NVIDIA Quadro M4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M4000 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M4000
2.573 TFLOPS
Tesla PG500 216 +449%
14.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1260 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
1664
Shading Units
5120
104
TMUs
320
64
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

49.47 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
80.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
2.573 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
80.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GV100
GM204-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.0
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy