Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 97% (2050MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 211.6GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000
4.252 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +294%
16.79 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

861 MHz
Base Clock
1950 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
211.6GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
4096
128
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

66.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
132.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
4.252 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
132.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
DG2-512
GM204-875-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy