Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000 +480%
4.252 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

861 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
211.6GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

66.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
132.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.252 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
132.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
51W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GK107
GM204-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy