NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 410
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000M
+1005%
2.995 TFLOPS
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M5000M
+1966%
2810
Quadro 410
136
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
14.26GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
192
96
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.824 GPixel/s
93.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.30 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.995 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
271.1 GFLOPS
93.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.30 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
38W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GK107
N16E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-810-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
