NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1424 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000M
+969%
2.995 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1536
Shading Units
112
96
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
93.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.995 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
93.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
78W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
G92
N16E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
