NVIDIA Quadro M500M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M500M and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 82% (2050MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M500M
0.863 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+1845%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2016
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
1950 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
DG2-512
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
21.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
