Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M520 Mobile and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M520 Mobile
0.8 TFLOPS
Tesla PG500 216 +1666%
14.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1260 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
40.10GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
384
Shading Units
5120
16
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.328 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
16.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
799.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
24.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
21.1 billion
Unknown
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy