Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5500 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1165MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 224.4GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M5500 Mobile
4.772 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M +209%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1165 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
224.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
8192
128
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

74.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
149.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
4.772 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
149.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy