Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5500 Mobile and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.4GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 38% (1612MHz vs 1165MHz)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M5500 Mobile
4.772 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded +72%
8.253 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
1165 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.4GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
2048
Shading Units
2560
128
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

74.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
149.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
4.772 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
149.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
398 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy