Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1114MHz
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 317.4GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000
6.844 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +101%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
-
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
7680
192
TMUs
240
96
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
213.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
500W
600 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
8 billion
Transistors
8 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy