NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA GRID K120Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 and 512MB VRAM GRID K120Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K120Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000
+1999%
6.844 TFLOPS
GRID K120Q
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
988 MHz
Base Clock
-
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
192
192
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
213.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
130W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM200
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
