Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1114MHz vs 924MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000 +261%
6.844 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000 SE
1.892 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
823 MHz
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
924 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
1024
192
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.57 GPixel/s
213.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.892 TFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.14 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
GM204
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy