Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000 +1844%
6.844 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700M
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
-
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
3072
Shading Units
128
192
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
213.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM3
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy