NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000
+833%
6.844 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
988 MHz
Base Clock
-
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
384
192
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
213.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
51W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM200
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
