Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000 +808%
6.844 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
-
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
576
192
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
213.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
-
-
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy