Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (1114MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000 +224%
6.844 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
1344
192
TMUs
112
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
213.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
-
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
108W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy