Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (1114MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000 +188%
6.844 TFLOPS
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
1536
192
TMUs
128
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
213.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
-
-
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy