Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (1700MHz vs 1114MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 317.4GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000
6.844 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210 +230%
22.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
104
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
6656
192
TMUs
416
96
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
213.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy