Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
3064 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000 +29656%
6.844 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
-
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
3072
Shading Units
8
192
TMUs
4
96
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
213.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
12W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy