Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1114MHz vs 876MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla K40c 's Advantages
Lower TDP (245W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000 +35%
6.844 TFLOPS
Tesla K40c
5.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Oct 2013
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
745 MHz
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
2880
192
TMUs
240
96
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
213.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
245W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
GK180
-
GPU Variant
GK180-890-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy