NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M620 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock977MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M620 Mobile
1 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T
+1006%
11.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
756 MHz
Base Clock
-
977 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
6144
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
15.63 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
31.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
31.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
350W
-
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
