Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M620 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (30W vs 55W)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1098MHz vs 977MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M620 Mobile
1 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M +40%
1.405 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro M620 Mobile
27
Quadro M2000M +25%
34
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

756 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
977 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

15.63 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
31.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
31.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy