NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M620 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (1404MHz vs 977MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M620 Mobile
1 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Max Q
+403%
5.032 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro M620 Mobile
27
Quadro P3200 Max Q
+214%
85
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
756 MHz
Base Clock
1139 MHz
977 MHz
Boost Clock
1404 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
512
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
15.63 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.86 GPixel/s
31.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
78.62 GFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.032 TFLOPS
31.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
