Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 130M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 108W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1336 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 130M
0.013 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200 +16107%
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Jul 2014
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
1344
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
-
-
12.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GK104
G86-613-A2
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy