Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 130M and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
3320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 130M
0.013 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 +61338%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Aug 2021
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
26
8
Shading Units
3328
8
TMUs
104
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
12.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GA106
G86-613-A2
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
12 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy