Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 135M and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 9.504GB/s)
14064 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 135M
0.026 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X +184015%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Nov 2021
NVS Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
594 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
9.504GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
220
16
Shading Units
14080
8
TMUs
880
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
Aldebaran
G86-621-A2
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

10W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy