Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA GRID K1

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA GRID K1

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 4GB VRAM GRID K1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GRID K1 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
184 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
GRID K1 +1317%
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Mar 2013
NVS Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
192
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GK107
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
GK107-450-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy