Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Lower TDP (12W vs 70W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.14GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
56 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M +595%
0.16 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Feb 2008
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
8
8
Shading Units
64
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

12W
TDP
70W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
G92
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy