Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 55W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M +2386%
0.572 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GK107
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

12W
TDP
55W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy