Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
952 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000M +4917%
1.154 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
960
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.02 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.08 GTexel/s
-
-
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1154 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
48.08 GFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GK104
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
N14E-Q3-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy