Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 +13078%
3.031 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
64bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
4
40
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
G98
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
12W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy