Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 65W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.14GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M +337%
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
6
16
Shading Units
48
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

21W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy