Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA A10G

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA A10G

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 12GB VRAM A10G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
9208 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
A10G +149995%
31.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2009
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro NVS
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1320 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
72
8
Shading Units
9216
4
TMUs
288
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.52 TFLOPS
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.52 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
985.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

23W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy