CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA A10G
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA A10G
VS
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
NVIDIA A10G
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 12GB VRAM A10G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
9208 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
A10G
+149995%
31.52 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
VS
A10G
Graphics Card
May 2009
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro NVS
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1320 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
72
8
Shading Units
9216
4
TMUs
288
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.52 TFLOPS
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.52 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
985.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
2
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Tesla P40
3
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000
4
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
5
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Tesla M40
6
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000
7
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
8
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q
9
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
10
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Related News
1
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
2
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
3
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
4
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
5
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
6
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
7
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
8
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
9
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
10
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy