Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 35W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.28GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
40 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M +452%
0.116 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2009
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
695 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
6
8
Shading Units
48
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

23W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy