Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 55W)
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
184 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M +1909%
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2009
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
695 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
4
8
Shading Units
192
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

23W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy