Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (23W vs 42W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
24 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 +180%
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2009
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
695 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
4
8
Shading Units
32
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
-
-
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

23W
TDP
42W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy